I'm just going to sperg a bit on some random thoughtmilk and make schizo connections that probably aren't real, but maybe they are? IS FOR YOU TO DECIDE. These will be interesting ideas to explore regardless. Do you ever just suspend your own beliefs and think from random perspectives for funsies? It's my 2nd hobby after fashion.
So my thought progression started with an excerpt from The Epistle of Jude 1:13
"wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever."
In Greek, which is the original language that the Book of Jude was written in, the words 'wandering stars' is translated from the Greek word πλανήτης or pronounced planetes, which is where we get the English word 'planet' from. They were called wandering stars in ancient Greece because 'planets' weren't really a thing, but when you watch the planets travel throughout the night sky... they tend to wander. For those of you who aren't aware you can actually see most of the planets with the naked eye when looking at the night sky. Now the stars are static, they 'move' across the sky, but they never move out of the configuration of their constellations. They will always keep their position. Meanwhile the planets will travel through the different constellations they never have a 'static position' in a constellation. They are the wanderers. So πλανήτης wandering star comes from the Greek word πλανάω planos which means wander.
Now here is where we suspend our beliefs... and let's just forget about The Science for a little bit. Honestly though, after Memeflu 2020 who even believes in the The Science anyway? It's just become another religion, words and ideas based on faith... and that faith is in THE MOST true and honest institution of our times, our beloved government who is only capable of good and righteousness and will never lie kek. Not to sound like some over-zealous religious nut job, but I'm kind of over The Science at this point. Whatever the mainstream media says (being simply the propaganda arm of the true and honest government) I'm just going to by default believe the opposite from now on. So whatever they say The Science is, it truly is not. Sorry Supreme Overlord Fauci I DON'T TRUST TRUST THE SCIENCE :')
So what if the planets are not what The Science tells us they are? What if the πλανήτης planetes truly are wandering stars? What? Stars and planets clearly are not the same thing -__- And that doesn't make sense in this context because we are thinking of stars in the version that The Science tells us the stars are. So what if the stars are actually not what we've been told? And lets be real now... who has actually been to a star, examined it up close, took a sample and brought it back to us for testing and can with 100% certainty tell us what a star truly is. Literally no one. We again just 'Trust The Science' because someone who we think is smarter than us told us this.
So what is a star? Let's put on our tinfoil caps and think like schizophrenic for a moment. In the Holy Bible there are references as stars being symbolic of angels. Let's look at a few verses.
"When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" - Job 38:7
For context, the sons of God are the angels.
"The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches." - Rev 1:20
This verse is literally saying the seven stars are angels.
"And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth" - Rev 12:4
"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him." -Rev 12:9
These verses describe Satan taking a 3rd of the angels with him in his fall from heaven.
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!" -Isaiah 14:12 Lucifer is often times referred to as 'the morning star' and we have to remember that Lucifer was actually an angel (who became a fallen angel upon rebelling against God). But some Bible translations actually say here; NIV: morning star son of the dawn, NIRV: you were the bright and morning star, NLT: O shining star son of the morning, NASB: you star of the morning son of Dawn, ESV: O Day Star son of Dawn etc You get the point.
In Genesis 2:1 it is stated during the biblical creation: "Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them." This includes the sun, moon, stars and 'all the host of them' includes the angels. This is the first mention of angels in the bible. When looking at the original Hebrew language this passage was written in you will see the heavens שמים shamayim means sky, visible heavens, abode of stars. And the host of them refers to צָבָא tsaba which means that which goes forth to war, host of an organized army, host of angels, host of stars.
"And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them." - Daniel 8:10
"He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names." - Psalm 147:4
Personified stars with names... angels?
So.... You get the jist of it. There are a lot of references and definitely some sort of correlation between stars and angels as far as the Bible is concerned. Okay, lets get back to my thesis: Are the planets wandering stars? So if stars are angels and planets are wandering stars.... are planets wandering angels? And what the heck is a wandering angel??
Lets go back to creation in Genesis 1. The stars were made on the 4th day of creation.
"And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years. And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good." -Gen 1:14 - 18
These stars (or possibly angels) were created to give light to the earth and to use as a way to tell time and the seasons; hence the constellations moving position depending of the time of night and being different constellations all together depending on the time of the year. But not only do they 'give light' as a means to visibly see things, but also 'give light' as a reflection of the goodness of God's glory. They 'divide the light from the darkness' as in to separate righteousness from evil. The angels are servants who are obedient to the will of God. This is why the angels of the host of heaven remain unchanging in their static positions among their constellations. They know their place in the heavens. They follow the order that God has created. They are unchanging as God is.
So if a star or an angel is obedient to God and keeps their places among the heavens that means a wandering star does not keep their place? Do they renounce their place in their constellation in the heavens? Are they disobedient and reject God's order? Are they an angel in rebellion? Is a wandering star a fallen angel??? In Jude 1:6 he says "And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day." The angels who have not kept their first estate have left their place among the host of heaven are the fallen angels. But also πλανάω planos the Greek word wandering has a 2nd meaning beyond moving out of order, but it also means to mislead or deceive, an impostor or corrupter. (insert mind blown emoji) But wait! There's more...
All of the planets are named after the gods (lower case g) of old; Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus. According to the Bible and other ancient texts the gods of ancient mythology DID indeed exist, but they are not actually gods and they are either fallen angels or the Nephilim (descendants of fallen angels). Which is why they are so mighty and powerful compared to man. This is why ancient man of the pagan religions worshipped them in their polytheistic belief systems. This is also why in astrology (a form of pagan divination which God strictly warns against) there are concepts like Mercury being in Sagittarius, where the positions of the wandering stars or fallen angels are so heavily focused on. It's just another form of idol worship and worshiping that which is not the one true God. But also astrology is reaching out to a demonic presence (planets or fallen angels) for answers.
In regards to ancient polytheism most cultures followed the same format with the 7 main deities (fallen angels) that all correlate to the same aspects of society; war, fertility, wisdom, agriculture, the ocean etc which also belong to the same corresponding planet. The only difference is the name each god is called based on which culture we are looking at. It's just very interesting when looking at ancient cultures and how their beliefs seem to follow a similar format... but that's a blog for another day.
Let's look back to the original verse from Jude that sparked this entire thought progression.
"wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever." - Jude 1:13
And lets look at some excerpts from the Book of Enoch. This book is in some cases is considered 'extra biblical' and not cannon to the Bible by some sects of Christianity. However, it is absolutely cannon among denominations such as Orthodox Christianity. In my opinion the Book of Enoch does not conflict with biblical scripture, but actually enforces it and expands upon it. And the Bible also references what Enoch says serval times. So I personally tend to view it as possibly cannon or at least historically accurate and not in opposition to what the Bible says. Or in the very least biblically adjacent. Anywayyyyys....
"I likewise beheld terrestrial fountains, deep in the fiery columns of heaven. And in the columns of heaven I beheld fires, which descended without number, but neither on high, nor into the deep. Over these fountains also I perceived a place which had neither the firmament of heaven above it, nor the solid ground underneath it; neither was there water above it, nor anything on wing; but the spot was desolate. And there I beheld seven stars, like great blazing mountains, and like spirits entreating me. Then the angel said, This place, until the consummation of heaven and earth, will be the prison of the stars, and the host of heaven. The stars which roll over fire are those which transgressed the commandment of God before their time arrived; for they came not in their proper season. Therefore was He offended with them, and bound them, until the period of the consummation of their crimes in the secret year." - Enoch 18:12 - 16
This basically expands upon the wandering stars of Jude 1:13 being the 7 planets that are the 7 stars of Enoch (possibly the 7 stars of Rev 1:20, I'm not certain though because these are the stars of the 7 churches). The prison of the stars of the host of heaven that transgressed (went against) the commandment of God, which they will be held in the desolate spot being 'the blackness of darkness for ever'.
In conclusion... What if The Science is wrong about the stars and the planets and the ancient texts given to us from God are accurate? What if The Science is just a reeducation tool of the antichrist infrastructure used to undermine God and make use believe that He can't exist because it is 'scientifically' impossible. What if the 'outer space' of The Science is all sorts of completely wrong and doesn't even exist in the way we have been lead to believe for the last few decades. I've never been to space, so I can't even say what it is or isn't. I've only read about it in text books from people who also can't prove any of it with hard evidence. What if all of The Science is literally science fiction??