But let's just think about the stars for a moment. Or if it is evening maybe go outside and stop to take a long gaze at them irl. They are dynamic celestial bodies. They flicker, sparkle, twinkle, even glimmer in a revolving sequence of different colors. They are... truly magnificent. If you have some planets in view why not take a moment to observe those as well. Mercury, Mars, Venus, Jupiter and sometimes Saturn can typically be seen with naked eye depending where you are in the hemisphere/time of year etc. The planets have a constant glow, but their light is static and they don't twinkle or sparkle like the stars do. The stars seem to be full of life, teeming with energy and dancing joyfully in place.
So we'll start by looking at some videos that I will link below. These videos show suuuuuper close ups of stars. These are not Nasa videos that have been 'up-resed', potentially altered and doctored or falsified all together by any organization. These are videos from regular people with their regular cameras and telescopes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_ukxGhX0w0
Now these are just random videos I searched using the terms 'stars close up'. Just to get some references of what I wanted to discuss. I'm not searching too hard for something to push an agenda, but just showcasing the similar results that come from different people. These are quite intriguing, the wave movements, the geometrical patterns, the strobing, pulsating and color changing etc. What is all this stuff? Hrmmm... Weird. Very peculiar. Truly fascinating indeed... Now we are more accustomed to seeing the typical Nasa image of a beautiful single static sparkle. But we never really get images that are super close ups. And the ones that organizations like Nasa do give us are typically computer models. Why is that? Are... they hiding something? Below is a Nasa star image... it is a cool photo, you can see some galaxies in the background. Datz coo. I question the legitimacy, but that's neither here nor there. If it's real, it's pretty darn rad.
Now these are just random videos I searched using the terms 'stars close up'. Just to get some references of what I wanted to discuss. I'm not searching too hard for something to push an agenda, but just showcasing the similar results that come from different people. These are quite intriguing, the wave movements, the geometrical patterns, the strobing, pulsating and color changing etc. What is all this stuff? Hrmmm... Weird. Very peculiar. Truly fascinating indeed... Now we are more accustomed to seeing the typical Nasa image of a beautiful single static sparkle. But we never really get images that are super close ups. And the ones that organizations like Nasa do give us are typically computer models. Why is that? Are... they hiding something? Below is a Nasa star image... it is a cool photo, you can see some galaxies in the background. Datz coo. I question the legitimacy, but that's neither here nor there. If it's real, it's pretty darn rad.
OKAY... so bare with me now... BUT... doesn't there seem to be an uncanny resemblance of the close up stars and the sound frequencies in liquid??? You see it, I know you do. Now why do the stars look like this if they are supposed to be in outer space which consists of a vacuum. A vacuum being a lack of matter and no particles. A vacuum where sound waves cannot travel.... But stars literally look like sound frequencies in water!! What if... we are being lied to and space isn't a vacuum... but it's actually some sort of liquid water?? And I know what you are thinking, "Umm orbs of burning fire can't exist in water because they will be immediately extinguished". Right. But what if stars aren't orbs of burning fire? There is a rather interesting property to water that is called 'sonoluminescence' where sound waves in water cause bubbles to shrink and implode and it creates an emission of light. What if the light from the stars is a result of the process of sonoluminescence. This would explain the flickering light as it's a constant series of sonoluminescence implosions occurring in place, at the same time, one on top of another.
And I know this sounds so completely bizarre; stars are twinkling implosions of lit up sound frequencies in water??? I know, this is completely hurting your brain because this sounds so insane and tarded. It's hurting my brain too :') SOUND? WHYYYYY SOUND?? So now I'm going to weave in the theories presented in 'Wandering Stars'. The sound in water theory actually makes sense when you bring in.... THE BIBLE XD. (nuuuuuuu not another ridiculous Bible theory). Sorry, but you know this is my specialty. So what if the stars are actually angels and outer space IS actually water? Let's see what we can find in the Bible about this :3
Now in the aforementioned blogpost I present many biblical references of the stars being angels. So I'm not going to list out all those verses again. And this next part is probably common knowledge, maybe not for some, but in the Bible it always talks about the angels (stars) singing God's praises, shouting, crying out etc. They are often referenced as making some sort of loud noise. So I will leave a couple verses to read though.
"When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy" -Job 38:7
"And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands." -Revelation 5:11
Now in the aforementioned blogpost I present many biblical references of the stars being angels. So I'm not going to list out all those verses again. And this next part is probably common knowledge, maybe not for some, but in the Bible it always talks about the angels (stars) singing God's praises, shouting, crying out etc. They are often referenced as making some sort of loud noise. So I will leave a couple verses to read though.
"When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy" -Job 38:7
"And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands." -Revelation 5:11
"And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men." -Luke 2:13-14
"And I beheld, and heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, Woe, woe, woe, to the inhabiters of the earth by reason of the other voices of the trumpet of the three angels, which are yet to sound!" -Revelation 8:13
"Above it stood the seraphims [angels]: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly. And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory!" -Isaiah 6:2-3
"And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever." -Revelation 11:15
The angels are... pretty noisy creatures. So there is possibility for them to be making the sound waves in order for the frequencies around them to create visual representations like in cymatics. But if they are in the vacuum of space there aren't any particles for the sound waves to react with. There is nothing to create the visual representation. Well what if they ARE... in water? Science tells us there is not water in space, or perhaps there is only possibility for frozen water on some obscure moons in the outer solar system. But let's see what the Bible says about water in outer space.
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." -Genesis 1:1-2
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." -Genesis 1:1-2
"And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day." -Gen 1:6-7
This is the first and second day of biblical creation and God hasn't created much yet, but it mentions 'the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters' in Gen 1:2. Is this the void of outer space? Has it always been some sort of water? Then in Gen 1:6 God creates a firmament to divide the waters above (the waters in the heavens or outer space) and the waters underneath (the waters on earth). The firmament is said to be a barrier that separates the waters in the heavens. The idea of the barrier that holds back the heavenly waters is actually a belief held by the ancient Egyptians, Babylonians and other cultures of old. The idea of vacuum of outer space is a rather recent concept.
"And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights." -Gen 7:10-12
"The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained; And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated." -Gen 8:2-3
These verses are talking about the great flood of Noah's arc. It talks about the 'windows of the heaven' being opened for the rain to pour out. This gives context that this isn't just some torrential rain from the process of evaporation and clouds precipitating down on the earth. The oceans/atmosphere simple does not hold enough water to flood the entire world completely. Thus a window to the waters of the heavens was opened to flood the earth with the waters of outer space.
"Praise ye the Lord. Praise ye the Lord from the heavens: praise him in the heights. Praise ye him, all his angels: praise ye him, all his hosts. Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light. Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens. Let them praise the name of the Lord: for he commanded, and they were created." -Psalm 148:1-5
You get the point, there are lots of mentions of the waters above. And if you feel like reading more into it there are even more verses that talk about the 'seas that surround the throne of God in heaven'. All of these waters in heaven is such an interesting concept. And then we think of astronauts and they do their training in water. And while in space they float as if they were in water. It's all just so intriguing. Especially when thinking of the waters in outer space as a real possibility. The cymatics of the stars being angels that loudly cry out and proclaim the glory of God. The sound frequencies in the waters of outer space create the sonoluminescence that are the twinkling lights of the stars. The stars that when viewed close up resemble the cymatic visual representations of sound frequencies in water that we can recreate even here on earth, just on a much less grand scale, of course.
So what about planets? I haven't quite fleshed this part out yet. But if the planets are 'Wandering Stars' as proposed in this previous blog. Then they are fallen angels, they are in rebellion. They don't follow the celestial obedience and order of God, nor do they cry out loudly to sing His praises. Their light is not sonoluminescent or the implosions of sound in water. Even when looking at them, they don't have the fantastic geometrical patterns, strobing, pulsating and color changing that we see in star cymatics. So we can deduce that their light and visual representation must not be from sound. Maybe they do, in fact, reflect the light of the sun? Maybe they are bioluminescent and their light comes from their own dull and faint light source, the last remaining remnant of dim light fading away as does the glory of God that they once reflected. No longer twinkling and lively like stars because they have chose to no longer radiate the brilliant light from the sound of their cries of God's glory.
So what about planets? I haven't quite fleshed this part out yet. But if the planets are 'Wandering Stars' as proposed in this previous blog. Then they are fallen angels, they are in rebellion. They don't follow the celestial obedience and order of God, nor do they cry out loudly to sing His praises. Their light is not sonoluminescent or the implosions of sound in water. Even when looking at them, they don't have the fantastic geometrical patterns, strobing, pulsating and color changing that we see in star cymatics. So we can deduce that their light and visual representation must not be from sound. Maybe they do, in fact, reflect the light of the sun? Maybe they are bioluminescent and their light comes from their own dull and faint light source, the last remaining remnant of dim light fading away as does the glory of God that they once reflected. No longer twinkling and lively like stars because they have chose to no longer radiate the brilliant light from the sound of their cries of God's glory.
Well... that was a wild ride! And while modern science technically can't even prove all or even most of their theories on space and astronomy, I can't say I even necessarily believe all of my own ideas either. However, it sure is fascinating to ponder what sort of instances lie out there that we, in this life, may never possibly know.